Time / Ideas / Science

What makes time?

Given that this class is called “Time”, depending on your disposition you might find it exciting or scary to know that scientists today debate the very existence of “time”. Is it a fundamental part of the universe? Something real but emergent? An illusion? Do these distinctions matter?

A chart of the solar system from 1716 titled "Systema solare et planetarium ex hypothesi Copernicana" from the Library of Congress.
Systema solare et planetarium ex hypothesi Copernicana

Time and Space

Counterfactual #1: In the book and film “Hail Mary”, the charming alien Rocky comes from planet Erid, which author Andy Weir imagined to have a dense, opaque atmosphere. Any intelligent life on such a planet, gazing upwards, would only ever see an overcast sky, and would never form the kinds of constellation imagery or sky mythology Earth civilizations have.

A still from the film Hail Mary showing Rocky and Ryan Grace.

Counterfactual #2: In the far, far distant future, the accelerating expansion of the universe and the death of earlier generations of stars means that any intelligent life looking to the sky might see a sky much darker than ours. Dead stars, and galaxies that have slipped past the observable horizon.

But we live now, on a planet with an atmosphere sometimes crystal clear, our cheerful yellow sun shining through it and casting shadows. There is an infinite variety of pattern in the things we see in the sky. That cheerful sun appears to follow a daily path through the sky, a path that changes from day to day in a seasonal pattern and one that humans have watched with intense interest since before we were human. A vast expanse of pinpoint stars and colorful galaxies creates a unique, nearly unchanging pattern of the firmament. That beautiful pattern of light forms the backdrop to other fascinating sky objects – our constantly changing moon, our neighboring planets (and their moons, when we learned to see them), comets.

All of those objects – the sun, the moon, the planets, the stars – appear to move in an intricate pattern. The pattern defies a simple description: there is not an integer number of days in a year, or in the cycle of the moon’s phases; the planets move sometimes with the stars, sometimes against, and always shifting.

One could almost imagine our sky as a puzzle presented to humanity intended to inspire our curiosity and spur us on to trying to solve the mystery of those patterns.

Why is this puzzle the way it is? Early in the class we will have an overview of some basic astronomy, inspired by Asimov’s early non-fiction book, The Clock We Live On. Later we might loop back to astronomy to discuss just how mind-meltingly gigantic the universe is, and our evolving understanding of that immensity. These are mostly in slide form for now, but I hope to outline them in more detail here soon.

Three schematic views of the solar system.
The Ptolemaic model of the universe.

Time’s Arrow & Time’s End

How could time end? Although a fundamental aspect of existence, time is impossible to isolate from the changing phenomena that mark its apparent passage. Of time, Einstein stated that “time is that which clocks measure”, and measurement requires an observable change. In one possible far future of the universe, maximum entropy is achieved and heat-death renders all differences between regions of space zero. Particles themselves decay, and no pocket of order remains in a sea of cold disorder. Change is no longer possible. When clocks cannot operate, time ends.

This progression from low-entropy order to high-entropy disorder, referred to as the “arrow of time”, has been proposed as the reason time seems to us to flow forward from past to future even while the underlying physics, when considered at a small enough scale, seem indifferent to which direction time goes.

ΔS≥0ΔS ≥ 0

Sean Carroll writes extensively and clearly about this, and the mystery of why entropy was low in the past (the Past Hypothesis).

Relativity and the Speed of Light

Do time and space exist independently of events and objects? Before Newton, various schools of thought went back and forth on this issue. However, Newton seemed to put the issue to rest. In his Principia, he declared “absolute, true, and mathematical” time and space exist separate from our relative, common understanding of them, which can only arise from perceptions of phenomena. Absolute space is the arena in which all things are placed, and absolute time is the true sequence and duration of events, regardless of how or if they are manifest as phenomena. Since Newton produced powerful results using these assumptions – the laws of motion that accurately describe the orbits of the planets (except Mercury, sort of… more on that later) – that seemed to settle the issue: Absolute time (and space) exists.

Two puzzles were bothersome, but no where near enough to throw out the result. Mercury’s motion seemed a bit weird – close to what Newton predicted but off just enough that it probably wasn’t a measurement error. All other planets seemed predicted perfectly.

Second puzzle: mass seems to manifest itself in two separate ways that just so happen to balance each other out. When gravity acts on a body, it does so in proportion to its gravitational mass and imparts a force on it resulting in an acceleration. Any acceleration, including gravity, is proportional to the force applied to a body and inversely proportional to its inertial mass. Thus, lead and wood fall at the same velocity – the attraction is greater for lead, but so is the inertia, so the resulting motion is the same. The coincidental equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass was troublesome.

Although Newton used his calculus to work out his theories, he presented the arguments in Principia geometrically (so as to be understandable to his contemporaries). The idea of pure, absolute time and space share an underlying similarity to Euclid’s conceptions of perfect idealized geometric concepts like a zero-dimensional point or a line with infinite length but no width – ideas that we could conceive of and reason with even though we never directly encounter them in reality. 

Keep in mind that the term relativity already existed for Newton, from Galileo’s concept of the inertial invariance of laws of motion. It doesn’t matter if a ship is moving across the water relative to land, or a planet through space relative to the galaxy – a set of objects can share an inertial frame of reference, and laws relating to their motion apply. A ball dropped from a moving ship will appear to fall straight down from the reference point of the ship, as it would on land. The same ship-bound ball, when viewed from land however, will follow a curved path relative to a reference point of the shore because of the relative velocity between the frames. No problem. 

Leading up to Einstein, we must note another development. The relationship between two seemingly separate forces was characterized by Faraday: Electricity and magnetism came to be seen as related aspects of the same fundamental force. This relationship was quantified by Maxwell’s equations governing electromagnetism.

However, there was a problem, which would become a defining problem in physics in the early 1900s: Maxwell’s equations (which, like Newton’s, have far-reaching explanatory power) insist that there is a fixed speed at which light propagates. Not in relationship to an observer, or an inertial frame of reference, but absolute. One interpretation was that this speed is relative, but to an as-yet-unknown medium, dubbed “ether”. Scientists began searching for evidence of the ether. (See the Michelson-Morley and Fizeau experiments.) No evidence of ether was found, yielding a null result that puzzled scientists at the time. Enter Einstein.

In 1905, railways were growing, and for the first time, people could move from point to point fast enough that the relative local times – based on solar noon at a precise location – become a problem. If a train is leaving village A at noon for town A, what time is it in town B, where it will arrive? Coordinating the movement of trains and clocks was a pertinent problem of the day. Einstein, working in a patent office, must have reviewed proposed solutions to coordinating time along railroad tracks. And he was puzzled by the null result for ether – why do all measurements of light seem to yield the same velocity, regardless of the motion of the observer?

in 1905, the so-called Annus Mirabilis, he published 4 papers, including on the Electrodynamics of Moving Objects. Using a geometrical argument, he took as granted that all observers will measure the same velocity for light regardless of their relative velocity, and rearranged space and time to account for different inertial frames, given the special case that those frames were moving relative to one another in a straight line at uniform velocity: Special Relativity. In short, as velocity increases, time slows down and space contracts in the direction of motion. Incorporating an idea from his teacher Minkowsky, Einstein simplified the geometrical equations with three spatial variables + time to a four-dimensional space where time has a imaginary component, known as the Lorentz transformation. 

Another 10 years of thinking applied relativity to all forms of motion (accelerative/curved as well as uniform) and unified inertial and gravitational mass: General Relativity. This theory correctly predicted motion of Mercury, and that light would bend in a gravitational field. This leads to the notion of curved space time. 

Some of the best resources on relativity (in addition to Einstein’s approachable paper, above):

Heisenberg Uncertainty

You might be familiar with the idea that a particle’s momentum and velocity are subject to Heisenberg uncertainty – knowing one more inherently means knowing the other less. The same is true for time and energy:

https://nigerianscholars.com/tutorials/quantum-physics-intro/heisenberg-uncertainty-for-energy-and-time

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/515401/example-of-heisenberg-uncertainty-principle-energy-time

Further Topics

  • Entropy, Maxwell’s Demon, and Meng Po
  • Analemmas and the Equation of Time
  • Presentism, Eternalism, and the Block Universe
  • Sidereal and mean solar days
  • Elevation and Azimuth
  • Ephemerides
  • Equinoctial
  • International Atomic Time (TAI)
  • The metonic cycle
  • Superior highly composite numbers

Science Links

Over the years I’ve accumulated about a thousand time-related bookmarks. In 2026, I used Claude Cowork to scan the links, eliminate duplicates and dead ends, and place the remainder in organized categories following the six sections of the syllabus. These are from that process. While I found all these links originally, I haven’t reopened each link to see how Claude did… Spot checking so far seems like this is a valuable improvement, so I’m sharing on the syllabus.

General

Solar System Simulators & Orbital Tools

Relativity & Physics of Time

GPS & Satellite Timing

  • GPS.gov: Timing Applications — Official GPS.gov page explaining how the atomic clocks aboard GPS satellites broadcast free precision time used to synchronize power grids, cell networks, and financial transaction timestamps worldwide.
  • List of GPS Satellites — A continuously updated Wikipedia table cataloguing all 83 GPS satellites ever built, with launch dates, rocket, block type, SVN/PRN numbers, and current operational status.
  • GPS Surpassed by BeiDou in China — A 2017 Geospatial World news brief reporting that China’s homegrown BeiDou navigation system had overtaken GPS in domestic chip market share and industrial output value.
  • Sharper GPS Needs Even More Accurate Atomic Clocks — A physicist’s Conversation op-ed on how onboard atomic clock drift caps GPS position accuracy at a few meters, and how new ytterbium optical lattice clocks could shrink that error.
  • GPS Network Time Synchronization — A Masterclock vendor guide contrasting NTP and PTP timing protocols and explaining how GPS satellites’ onboard atomic clocks serve as the master time reference for synchronizing computer networks.
  • Time & Frequency Activities — A Naval Research Laboratory conference slide deck detailing GPS satellite atomic clock technology, on-orbit clock life testing, and development of the next-generation GPS timescale.
  • GPS IIR Rubidium Clocks: In-Orbit Performance Aspects — A defense technical report analyzing the in-orbit frequency stability and projected operational lifetimes of the rubidium atomic clocks flown aboard GPS Block IIR satellites.
  • Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System — Wikipedia’s technical rundown of India’s NavIC regional satellite navigation system, covering its signal structure and the repeated onboard atomic clock failures that have degraded its accuracy.
  • Owners of Old iPhones and iPads MUST Update Their Software Before Sunday — A Daily Mail news report warning that the 2019 GPS week-number rollover would break location and timing features on unpatched older iPhones and iPads.
  • Orbit Pavilion — A NASA JPL-designed shell-shaped outdoor sound installation at The Huntington that translates the real-time orbital passes of the ISS and 19 Earth-science satellites into distinct sounds.
  • Tracking the Satellites That Keep Us on Track: Monitoring GPS, Galileo, BeiDou, and GLONASS — A Hackaday writeup on an open-source project that uses off-the-shelf receivers to publicly monitor the ephemeris, health, and atomic-clock timing of every satellite in the GPS, Galileo, BeiDou, and GLONASS constellations.
  • Starlink: How SpaceX’s 12,000-Satellite Internet Network Will Work — A Business Insider explainer on the engineering behind SpaceX’s planned 12,000-satellite Starlink constellation designed to beam broadband internet to the ground.

Lunar Timekeeping

  • What is a Lunar Month? — Reference page breaking down the 29.5-day synodic month, why lunar months vary in length, and includes a full year-by-year lunar calendar table.
  • We Need Moon Standard Time — News article on ESA’s push for a shared lunar reference clock so Moonlight satellites and Artemis missions can communicate and navigate together.
  • Telling Time on the Moon — ESA feature detailing the technical fight to define lunar time, including the fact that clocks on the Moon run about 56 microseconds faster per day than on Earth.
  • Make a Moon Phases Calendar and Calculator — NASA/JPL classroom activity for building a paper wheel calculator that predicts the Moon’s phase and rise/set times for any date.

PBS Space Time (YouTube)

  • How Special Relativity Makes Magnets Work — Video walkthrough of how magnetism emerges as a relativistic side effect of moving electric charges.
  • Time Crystals! — PBS Space Time journal-club episode dissecting the physics papers behind time crystals, a phase of matter that repeats in time instead of space.
  • The Origin of Matter and Time — PBS Space Time episode on how matter and the arrow of time itself emerged in the earliest moments after the Big Bang.

Maxwell’s Equations